“The recently declassified 'UFO' sightings have been pretty thoroughly debunked as spurious.”
Full comment
The recently declassified 'UFO' sightings have been pretty thoroughly debunked as spurious. this video
Pentagon officially released 'UFO' videos: BUSTED (Part 1)
395K views · May 3, 2020 · 20:53 · 0 HN recommenders · 6 mentions · discussed 2020–2022
Thunderf00t argues that the Pentagon's officially released 'UFO' videos have mundane explanations such as birds, parallax and sensor artifacts.
Why Hacker News points people here: HN cites it as a debunking whenever Pentagon UFO footage is discussed.
What Hacker News said 6
“the object was probably just a bird, and the apparent speed was a result of parallax”
Full comment
This video argues that the object was probably just a bird, and the apparent speed was a result of parallax. Seems more plausible than the alternatives. this video
“These are not aliens.”
Full comment
These are not aliens. Media love to insinuate that they are because it gets clicks. (or even outright say they are aliens) this video link link
“It is obvious to any expert that these are not space aliens.”
Full comment
It is obvious to any expert that these are not space aliens. that makes the question of why the Navy is hyping them even more interesting. this video
“these videos are all explained and all have been debunked.”
Full comment
I've said it once, I'll say it again-- these videos are all explained and all have been debunked. This is most likely a advertisement for the US Military's ability to track very small things such as drones. If there are videos of things that might be alien-- these are not them. this video link link link link Bob Lazar debunk: link
“At least those videos [1] are just birds, see for example this analysis [2].”
Full comment
At least those videos [1] are just birds, see for example this analysis [2]. Skip to the meat of it, if you dislike the style of the video. [1] link [2] this video