Talks to Watch

Tom Scott vs Irving Finkel: The Royal Game of Ur | PLAYTHROUGH | International Tabletop Day 2017

8.1M views · Apr 28, 2017 · 25:33 · 6 HN recommenders · 9 mentions · discussed 2019–2025

Tom Scott plays the Royal Game of Ur against British Museum curator Irving Finkel, who deciphered its rules from a cuneiform tablet. Finkel teaches the game and explains its history as the oldest playable board game.

Why Hacker News points people here: Recommended in threads on ancient games and cuneiform as a charming match with an enthusiastic expert.

“he also did a fantastic video on with Tom Scott”HN comment, 2025

What Hacker News said 9

Strongly recommendsjedimastertDec 2019

“He's got two incredible videos with Tom Scott”

Irving Finkel teaches Tom Scott the Royal Game of Ur

Full comment

He really is. He's got two incredible videos with Tom Scott where the two of them play what could be considered the worlds oldest game[0] and he introduces Tom and Matt to "writing" cuneiform[1]. He's so sharp in both, I love seeing him anywhere else now. [0]: this video [1]: link

in “How writing began, and other unexpectedly funny stories about cuneiform [video]” · view on HN
Strongly recommendssothatsitNov 2025

“he also did a fantastic video on with Tom Scott”

Finkel's fantastic video on the Royal Game of Ur with Tom Scott

Full comment

I was lucky enough to meet Irving Finkel a couple of times and he is as eccentric in person as he is in his brilliant lectures, talks, and videos. When I met him all the shelves, and even the floor, in his office was covered with different books, papers, and artifacts. He has amassed quite a collection of interesting things. I met him through my work related to the Royal Game of Ur, which he also did a fantastic video on with Tom Scott: this video

RecommendsjhallenworldFeb 2020

“I like much better the Royal Game of Ur-”

Playthrough of the Royal Game of Ur

Full comment

I've gotten into ancient games recently, and I've tried Senet with various rule variations- I think it's kind of boring. I like much better the Royal Game of Ur- this video I've also been playing with Indian Pachisi, two player is kind of boring, but I still need to try four player / doubles.

in “Senet: the original board game of death?” · view on HN
RecommendsacheronJul 2021

“There’s a great video on YouTube of Irving Finkel (quite an interesting guy) playing the Royal Game of Ur.”

Finkel playing the Royal Game of Ur

Full comment

There’s a great video on YouTube of Irving Finkel (quite an interesting guy) playing the Royal Game of Ur. this video

Recommendsmabub24Jul 2021

“This is an interesting video from Dr. Irving Finkel on it and its playing rules.”

Finkel explains Ur and its playing rules

Full comment

You might be thinking of Ur, which is roughly 4,500 years old. This is an interesting video from Dr. Irving Finkel on it and its playing rules.[0] [0]: this video

RecommendsyregJun 2023

“I enjoyed the interaction.”

Finkel and Tom Scott play the game of Ur

Full comment

Irving Finkel made a video with Tom Scott, playing the game of Ur. I enjoyed the interaction. this video I'm sure he has many other even better videos, but I will have to yet get to them.

in “Turn dumb tweets into cuneiform tablets” · view on HN
Cites itjhallenworldJun 2020

Example of binary dice used for the Royal Game of Ur

Full comment

I've been trying other non-roman dice: Indian four-sided dice: link Two-sided dice (cowry shells) for Indian Pachisi- they are terrible! link More binary dice for the Royal Game of Ur: this video

in “How dice changed over 2k years to be more fair (2018)” · view on HN
Cites itRendelloFeb 2021

“He also taught Tom to play The Royal Game of Ur [1]”

Finkel teaches Tom Scott the Royal Game of Ur

Full comment

He also taught Tom to play The Royal Game of Ur [1], a Middle-Eastern precursor to Backgammon that was the Chess of that era in terms of popularity. Irving was the one to decipher the rules from a cuneiform tablet. 1. this video

Cites itJoel_MckayJun 2024
Full comment

"Okay, so I buy a card I can actually afford on eBay, put it in my machine, buy a game, and get my account permabanned." One would have to prove they are a different person/account-location to IT admin support. It is rare, but some companies will simply watch your game-play for a bit to see what you are up to compared to the prior ban details. Note one will likely have to gamble on the compassion of each firms IT admins. "What refund am I asking for that makes this okay?" These sellers are almost always knowingly trying to evade the consequences of their behavior, and trying to recoup their money to buy un-flagged hardware. This is pointless, as there are several anti-cheat queries companies can run, and like any antisocial behavior they usually just make the situation worse for themselves by contaminating the market with more flagged hardware. Eventually their sellers reputation score will warn buyers what they are doing. Getting a refund for the "broken" equipment is a standard ebay RMA process, and Craigslist/meta-Marketplace returns can be a bit more complex. Keep in mind a ban may eventually lift after 12 months, but IT admins may be less convinced of your intent if a user keeps popping up as a problem. "This reads as condescending" It is not my call what companies do with problematic users. And MTG events also bans cheats for marked decks, and pulling unfair tricks that violate the rules. The difference is people will be upset with such antics at the same table. Persona

in “Anti-Cheat Expert: all your pixels are belong to us” · view on HN