Matt Parker of Stand-up Maths asks whether a country's reported land area accounts for hills and mountains, working through how surface area depends on the resolution of elevation data. It follows up on a question from a viewer and work by researchers who measured it.
Why Hacker News points people here: HN recommends it in map projection and coastline threads as a fun look at how measurement choices change area figures.
“Matt Parker from Standup Maths made a great video on exactly this subject”HN comment, 2020
Explores whether national land area accounts for elevation.
Full comment
>But then realized that the coastline paradox must also exist for 3D surfaces (TINs or DEMs or whatnot) so asking “what is the area of a surface on earth” can be a very complex question if dealing with elevation. StandUpMaths did a great video on this recently, asking whether national land area includes elevation and which nations would gain/lose the most land area if it were/weren't: this video
RecommendsjobigoudNov 2020
“Matt Parker from Standup Maths made a great video on exactly this subject”
Matt Parker on whether land area assumes flat countries.
Full comment
Matt Parker from Standup Maths made a great video on exactly this subject a few weeks ago. "Does land area assume a country is perfectly flat?" this video
RecommendsrdlwApr 2023
“Great video on this from Matt Parker”
Area measurement depends on elevation data resolution.
Full comment
Then it becomes a coastline problem, with different answers depending on the resolution of your elevation data. Great video on this from Matt Parker (focusing on area in this case): this video
Cites itjobigoudAug 2021
“Cf. Stand-up Maths”
Cited for the topography and area measurement rabbit hole.
Full comment
> over every hill, dale, nook and cranny in England That would take topography into account which another rabbit hole like calculating the perimeter of Great Britain. Cf. Stand-up Maths, Does "land area" assume a country is perfectly flat? this video
