Talks to Watch

Can C++ be 10x Simpler & Safer? - Herb Sutter - CppCon 2022

277K views · Nov 12, 2022 · 1:54:00 · 6 HN recommenders · 8 mentions · discussed 2022–2024

Herb Sutter's CppCon 2022 talk on whether C++ can become ten times simpler and safer. He introduces his experimental Cpp2 syntax and the cppfront transpiler, explaining the limits on incremental improvement.

Why Hacker News points people here: HN recommends it as the main introduction to Cpp2 and cppfront, and as a credible effort to evolve C++.

“One of those few talks that left me genuinely enthused about the topic.”HN comment, 2024

What Hacker News said 8

Strongly recommendskarmakazeNov 2022

“this has the best chance of being a true C++ successor.”

Deeply thought out effort to simplify C++ syntax and fulfill Stroustrup's vision

Full comment

There are so many shallow comments for this deeply thought out, 7 year effort to date. If the rest of the 'to do' items gets tackled, implemented in prototypes, and made into proposals as some of the work to date has been handled, this has the best chance of being a true C++ successor. The goal is nothing more than fulfilling these B. Stroustrup quotes: "Inside C++, there is a much smaller and cleaner language struggling to get out." (1994) "Say 10% of size of C++ in definition and front-end compiler size. ... Most of the simplification would come from generalization." (2007) There's a summarization at 1:14:39[0] where concepts are listed on the left, and C++ syntax for handling these concepts in different contexts are on the right. The point of this effort is reduce the accidental complexity syntax on the right by refactoring it into concise uniform syntax. This effort is broad and much more than sugar, e.g. eliminating forward declarations. The talk up to that time is giving examples of the work that has been done in many of those areas, with remaining to-do's listed. Basically the language that is being extracted is the actual language that current C++ programmers really think in, but don't have a more concise way of writing than C++. [0] this video

in “Can C++ be 10x Simpler and Safer?” · view on HN
Strongly recommendsJNRoweMar 2024

“One of those few talks that left me genuinely enthused about the topic.”

Great introduction to the problems and solutions behind Cpp2

Full comment

Sutter's 2022 cppcon talk¹ is a great introduction to the topic, both the problems it attempts to solve and solutions it was/is settling on. One of those few talks that left me genuinely enthused about the topic. [It is probably worth watching for the Compiler Explorer interjection toward the end alone -- Matt Godbolt Appreciation Society] ¹ this video

in “Overview: What are Cpp2 and cppfront? How do I get and build cppfront?” · view on HN
RecommendscpetersoNov 2022

“For people curious about Herb's Cpp2, here's a presentation he gave at CppCon 2022”

Herb Sutter's presentation introducing Cpp2

Full comment

For people curious about Herb's Cpp2, here's a presentation he gave at CppCon 2022: "Can C++ be 10x Simpler & Safer? (Simplifying C++ #9 of N)" this video

in “Const vs. constexpr vs. consteval vs. constinit in C++20” · view on HN
Recommendsnorman784Dec 2022

“you can watch the talk about it here[1].”

Talk on cppfront as a safer language layered on C++

Full comment

I agree that ideally everything should be written in safer alternatives, in most scenarios is not feasible to migrate from C++ to another language, because of the code base size. I think cppfront[0] is the way to go if you want to write a safer language on top of C++, you can watch the talk about it here[1]. [0] link [1] this video

in “C++23: std:out_ptr and std:inout_ptr” · view on HN
RecommendsjdlygaJan 2023

“If anyone can help reform the language, it's Herb Sutter with his cpp2 syntax.”

Promising experimental simpler and safer syntax for C++

Full comment

There is a much safer and simpler language hiding inside of C++ waiting to be discovered. If anyone can help reform the language, it's Herb Sutter with his cpp2 syntax. It's very much an experimental hero project, but it's promising: this video

in “The Year of C++ Successor Languages” · view on HN
RecommendstaraharrisFeb 2023

“This is a good introductory talk on cpp2 by Sutter at CppCon three months ago”

Good introductory talk demonstrating the cppfront transpiler

Full comment

Has anyone else looked at Herb Sutter's cpp2? For those that don't use C++, Herb is chair of the ISO C++ standards committee, and holds the position of "native languages architect" at Microsoft. link This is a good introductory talk on cpp2 by Sutter at CppCon three months ago, where he demonstrates cppfront , the cpp2 -> C++ transpiler. One of the things I like about it is that the code it generates is human-readable and fully backwards-compatible with C++. If you use cpp2 in your project and end up not liking it, you still have the same (very reasonable) C++ code that you'd write by hand today if you followed the guidelines you're supposed to already. this video I think this is very promising, and I'm interested in using it my next project. We don't need a total replacement for C++, we just need to let out the awesome language that's always been hiding inside it.

Cites itxjayFeb 2023

“Herb Sutter is working on a standalone, second syntax for C++ called”

Source for Cpp2's goals of simplicity, safety and toolability

Full comment

Herb Sutter is working on a standalone, second syntax for C++ called "Cpp2" [1] to "reduce complexity 10x, increase safety 50x, improve toolability 10x, evolve more freely for another 30 years". [2] Compiler Explorer lists it under Cpp2-cppfront. [3] [1] link [2] this video [3] link

in “C++23 “Pandemic Edition” is complete” · view on HN
Cites itcredit_guyFeb 2023

“Check out this talk by Herb Sutter, around minute 43”

Around minute 43, government guidance steering industry away from C and C++

Full comment

> And C++ just... doesn't have that many real problems. It does not have many, but it has one and it's big. It's not memory safe. Check out this talk by Herb Sutter, around minute 43: This is the first time a government [see note] has actually issued guidance to industry broadly that was the barest paraphrase away from "where possible don't use C and C++" [ Note: in this context, the "government" is the US Department of Commerce and NIST, which, according to Herb, have issued a detailed guidance in response to the Executive Order on Cybersecurity [2]. While I couldn't find that guidance, I found one by the NSA [3], which saw quite a few comments here on HN in December last year [4] ]. [1] this video [2] link [3] link [4] link