“standard/pure/repeatable items aren't intrinsically "good" or "enjoyable".”
Standardized items aren't intrinsically enjoyable but still valuable.
Full comment
I find this to be a close cousin of Tom Scott's "Making an international standard cup of tea" video ( this video ). And very related to Tom Scott's "The US government will sell you freeze-dried urine" ( link ) and Veritasium's "The world depends on a collection of strange items. They're not cheap" ( link ) They bring forward the idea that standard/pure/repeatable items aren't intrinsically "good" or "enjoyable". But that doesn't make them not useful or valuable in other contexts. It also offers some food for thought when it comes to what metrics we decide to put value in. We may like the idea of a particular metric, or what we think it represents, but that doesn't make it worth optimizing for. A metric without context is useless, and taking a holistic view of what makes something worth doing allows us to make more informed decisions.