Talks to Watch

Hovering a Helicopter is Hilariously Hard - Smarter Every Day 145

6.9M views · Nov 20, 2015 · 9:45 · 2 HN recommenders · 3 mentions · discussed 2017–2021

Smarter Every Day host Destin Sandlin tries to hover a helicopter and finds it very hard. The video shows how the constant coordinated corrections across several control axes feel at first and how learning makes them automatic.

Why Hacker News points people here: HN uses it as a vivid example of tacit knowledge and skill acquisition, where the brain eventually abstracts away the complexity.

“SmarterEveryDay has an interesting video[2] about learning to hover a helicopter”HN comment, 2018

What Hacker News said 3

Recommendshexane360Mar 2017

“Here's a pretty good one.”

Explains constant 3-axis compensation needed to hover a helicopter

Full comment

this video Here's a pretty good one. It appears to be constant 3-axis compensation, although he alludes to newer helicopters that have made it much easier.

in “An 85-year old millionaire hides $1M treasure in the Rocky Mountains (2016)” · view on HN
Recommendspdkl95Aug 2018

“SmarterEveryDay has an interesting video[2] about learning to hover a helicopter”

Learning to hover until the brain abstracts away the complexity

Full comment

> Those helicopter pilots must have a very steady hand. Piloting a helicopter in general requires an incredibly steady hand on unintuitive controls that interact with each other in ways that are difficult to predict[1]. Being able to do that with high precision, a disturbingly small margin of error, and fatal consequences for almost any error is basically a superpower. [1] SmarterEveryDay has an interesting video[2] about learning to hover a helicopter, which apparently requires trying to hover (badly) until the brain learns how to abstract away all of the complexity. [2] this video

in “What to Do After Finding Hot Connectors on Overhead Power Lines (2017) [video]” · view on HN
Cites itrouterlJun 2021

“he has a lot of neat demonstrations of this distinction”

Example of tacit versus explicit knowledge via hovering a helicopter

Full comment

Thanks for pointing this out. It should be said, however, that Kuhn did cite Polanyi pretty extensively. Related: Destin, at the Smarter Every Day YouTube channel, has been kind of sliding into the same distinction Polanyi outlined, between "tacit knowledge" and explicit knowledge. Destin would label those "understanding" and "knowledge", respectively, but he has a lot of neat demonstrations of this distinction, e.g. riding a backwards bicycle[0], or hovering a helicopter[1]. [0] link [1] this video

in “Kuhn's Structure of Scientific Revolutions – outline (2013)” · view on HN