Talks to Watch

A New History for Humanity – The Human Era

10.1M views · Dec 7, 2016 · 7:09 · 3 HN recommenders · 8 mentions · discussed 2018–2025

Kurzgesagt explains the Holocene or Human Era calendar, which adds 10,000 years to the current year to anchor dates to the start of human civilization. It argues this gives a more sensible frame for human history.

Why Hacker News points people here: Linked whenever year numbering or the Holocene calendar comes up as the accessible introduction to the idea.

“Kurtzgesagt has a really great video about the subject”HN comment, 2025

What Hacker News said 8

Strongly recommendsdaekenOct 2025

“Kurtzgesagt has a really great video about the subject”

Really great video on the Human Era calendar

Full comment

I've become an unironic proponent of HE, the Human Era. For CE dates, we just add 10000 (I'm writing this from 12025). But for BCE dates, they're subtracted and it makes things so much clearer when it comes to telling how long ago something was. E.g. the sundial was invented around 6000 HE, steel was developed around 9000 HE. Kurtzgesagt has a really great video about the subject: this video There's also a timeline in HE that covers many major historical events: link

in “Greg Newby, CEO of Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, has died” · view on HN
RecommendsdoctobogganJan 2018

“His stuff is well sourced and generally reliable.”

Well-sourced, generally reliable videos on the topic

Full comment

It might not be what you were thinking, but the YouTube channel Kurzgesagt has 2 very good videos on the topic: link this video His stuff is well sourced and generally reliable.

in “Jawbone of Earliest Modern Human Out of Africa Discovered in Israeli Cave” · view on HN
RecommendsASalazarMXFeb 2018

“here's a good explanation of it”

Good explanation of the Holocene calendar

Full comment

I'm all for leaving a religious calendar and using the Holocene calendar. Just add 10,000 to your dates and you're set. link If you don't mind videos, here's a good explanation of it this video

in “Anthropocene began in 1965, according to signs left in world’s ‘loneliest tree’” · view on HN
Cites itGreen_manApr 2020

“a proposal to add a leading 1 to our year”

Proposal to add a leading 1 to the year

Full comment

This reminded me of a proposal to add a leading 1 to our year[2020 -> 12020]: this video Cesare Emiliani proposed that the Construction of the Göbekli Tepe 12,000 years ago could represent a "start of civilization", creating a "holocene calendar". link link link

in “Our Long Bets and Predictions about 02020” · view on HN
Cites itrendallJan 2021

“Cesare Emiliani and Kurzegesagt make the case that we think of world civilization as much newer than it is”

Case for adding 10,000 years to the year count

Full comment

Cesare Emiliani and Kurzegesagt make the case that we think of world civilization as much newer than it is, because our year count is now only to 2021. They argue for instead bumping our year by 10,000 to more truly reflect the age of our civilization, to 12,021, and (arbitrarily) commemorating Göbleki Tepe as its foundation link this video (2016 or 12016)

Cites itmLubySep 2021

“An 8min video by Kurzgesagt on it”

8-minute video on the Holocene calendar

Full comment

If we're using 5 digits, add 10K years: we're in year 12021 of this Holocene calendar. (Happy palindrome year!) 0 is pre-history, some of the very first permanent construction. An 8min video by Kurzgesagt on it: this video

in “No One Ever Saw the Snow Cruiser Again (2019)” · view on HN
Cites itawiesenhoferDec 2021

“An episode of kurzgesagt about this topic”

Kurzgesagt episode on the Human Era calendar

Full comment

Reminds me of the Holocene Calendar, which argues for setting the year 0 ten thousand years earlier to include all of major human history. So instead of writing 02022 AD it would become 12022 HE, for Human Era. It would mean to update these date libraries fast though... An episode of kurzgesagt about this topic: this video

in “Long Now Years: Five-Digit Dates and Y10K-Compliance at Home (02013)” · view on HN
Cites ittomrodMar 2025

“I suggest considering labeling even as 11973”

Suggests labeling years in the Human Era

Full comment

As a sidenote, I love that you reference 1973 as 01973. I suggest considering labeling even as 11973, based on some reasonable humanist-based information.[0] [0] this video

in “Deregulated energy markets accelerate solar adoption” · view on HN