Talks to Watch

World's Roundest Object!

38.5M views · Mar 25, 2013 · 11:44 · 6 HN recommenders · 9 mentions · discussed 2013–2018

Veritasium explains the effort to redefine the kilogram, which was still defined by a physical artifact, and how a near-perfect silicon sphere from the Avogadro project helps. It also covers the history of the unit's odd naming.

Why Hacker News points people here: Recommended in kilogram-redefinition threads as a clear, short explainer of the Avogadro and Planck approaches.

“this video is an imperative watch”HN comment, 2013

What Hacker News said 9

Strongly recommendskunaiOct 2013

“this video is an imperative watch”

Covers the Planck and Avogadro projects to redefine the kilo

Full comment

For anyone interested in the Planck and Avogadro projects to redefine the kilo, this video is an imperative watch: this video

in “The kilo is losing weight, changing all of science” · view on HN
Strongly recommendsgsteinb88Jul 2014

“Fantastic video by Vertiasium on this”

Fantastic video on the sphere for redefining the kilogram

Full comment

Fantastic video by Vertiasium on this: this video (side note: that video is about a sphere, but the current standard kilogram and its copies are actually shaped like little bells)

in “The Meter: The Measure of a Man” · view on HN
RecommendsEGregOct 2013

“there's a nice video on this”

Nice video on the kilogram and its redefinition

Full comment

"Weirdly, it’s not even known if the IPK is getting lighter, or if the national prototypes are getting heavier — but either way, something is causing these kilos to change weight, by around 50 micrograms every 100 years." Well they COULD always do that thing with the water where they heat it to 4 degrees celcius and measure its volume and weight. Then they'd know which it is. That said, there's a nice video on this: this video

in “The kilo is losing weight, changing all of science” · view on HN
RecommendsJamieLewisOct 2013

“it is also very interesting in it's own right.”

Explains how the kilogram got its name

Full comment

Check out this veritasium video this video - It goes into a little detail on how the kilogram got it's name, it is also very interesting in it's own right.

in “The kilo is losing weight, changing all of science” · view on HN
RecommendsozhDec 2014

“Well worth 10 minutes of your break today.”

Short documentary on the metric system and the roundest object

Full comment

I stumbled upon a very interesting short documentary about the metric system and the world's roundest object. Well worth 10 minutes of your break today. this video

in “Why Won’t America Go Metric?” · view on HN
RecommendsaexaeyNov 2015

“actually the whole video is excellent”

Explains how the gram was defined from water

Full comment

One cubic centimetre of water at 4 degrees Celsius used to define one gram (or more precisely one litre -> one kilogram, which comes out to be the exact same thing) [1], [2]. Although 1 cm^3 of water is still pretty damn close to 1g. [1] link [2] this video (around 1:50, and actually the whole video is excellent)

in “Why nuclear energy is our best option at the moment” · view on HN
Cites itvelodromeOct 2013
Full comment

The scientific community is working on the replacement: Known as the Avogadro Project, the plan is to bring together enough atoms of one substance – silicon – to make a kilo. Attention has focused on silicon because: - its characteristics are very well understood - a single crystal of the right size can be grown - its atomic structure is extremely uniform - its widespread use in the computer industry means it can be obtained with relative ease at high purity and resonable cost. A spherical shape was chosen because a sphere has no edges that might get damaged and only one dimension has to be measured in order to calculate its volume. --- link this video

in “The kilo is losing weight, changing all of science” · view on HN
Cites itDonbunEf7Jul 2017

“As Veritasium explains [0], all of the reference kilograms have drifted”

Full comment

As Veritasium explains [0], all of the reference kilograms have drifted, and some appear to weigh less than they used to. So even if we know the precise mechanism of action of the drift, it doesn't help with the fact that our measurements are less reliable than they used to be. Of course, what's probably happened is that our measuring tools have gotten more accurate! [0] this video

in “NIST to redefine the kilogram based on a fundamental universal constant” · view on HN
Cites itfengbNov 2018

“More info from an older Veritasium video”

Full comment

Mole was just redefined as exactly 6.02214076e23 — the number of Si-28 atoms in a perfect 1 kg sphere. This was an intentionally check against the kibble balance measurement. More info from an older Veritasium video: this video

in “International System of Units overhauled in historic vote” · view on HN