Carl Sagan testifying before Congress in 1985 on climate change

Almost. But those that did were not listened to as in this case where Carl Sagan clearly explains the situation before policy makers almost 40 yrs ago [1] 1: this video

I think it is important to remember that anti-renewables messaging has been around for a very long time. The panels might have needed to come off for repairs but definitely could have been put back up. Casually discarding even a public relations action like this likely had negative impacts on the discussion and many people taking the issue seriously for years to come. I don't know specifically how anti-renewables Regan was personally, but he definitely was the leader of a party that most strongly fought climate change messaging and actions in recent years. Here is Carl Sagan testifying before congress in 1985 this video Admittedly this hasn't necessarily been as strongly polarizing as it was during the 2010s, there was a time that it was a bipartisan issue that unified both parties in the interest of reducing foreign energy dependence. link

It’s 2022 and 40% of global electricity is from coal. We just hit 10% from solar and wind. Here’s Carl Sagan from 1985: this video He said China would use all that coal and they did. We lost decades of time. Now we need a few additional miracles.

Sounds more like a long-term plan… “It will take €10 trillion of investment by 2050 for Europe to transform its energy infrastructure” In case anyone is wondering how we got here, it required almost 40 years of not doing much to solve the problem. We’ll need another 30 years of effort. I imagine because we waited so long, we shortened our window to solve the problem. Thus requiring more money and a couple additional miracles. The multi-generational effort did turn out to be a problem. And all that coal in China. Carl Sagan understood the issues so well. this video

That’s not correct. There are large emission issues that would should tackle first. How we generate electricity is one of them. Carl Sagan warned us almost 40 years ago that coal would be a future problem. this video That was clearly a large problem that could have been addressed, and still needs to be ASAP. Coal-fired power stations emit over 10 Gt of carbon dioxide each year,[4] about one fifth of world greenhouse gas emissions, so are the single largest cause of climate change. 8500 coal power plants in the world. “Coal-fired power stations emit over 10 Gt of carbon dioxide each year,[4] about one fifth of world greenhouse gas emissions, so are the single largest cause of climate change.” link So, we start the discussion with air travel, trying to reduce 2% to under 2%. While we’ve ignored 20% of global emissions. We actually cost ourselves decades. So many miracles needed by 2050, when we could be talking 2070. Now, let’s just tell everyone we need to do everything at once.

I hear all kinds of narratives on this. According to this EPA article, US emissions are down 20% since 2005. link Of course, global emissions are way up but we were warned 40 years ago about global coal use. this video

100,000 flights a day, every single day of the year 2% of emissions. Coal power plants 25% of emissions. So many people going after aviation, it explains how we got this far into the problem. Carl Sagan warned everyone about coal 40 years ago. this video So, instead we talk about aviation

Here is Carl Sagan's original essay on climate change in 1980 where he warned specifically about global cooling based on deforestation: link 5 years later he testified to Congress about the dangers of excess CO2 emissions causing runaway warming : this video On the surface these two messages may seem contradictory but underlying both is a consistent message that excessive man-made changes to a delicate highly non-linear system are dangerous to our survival as a species.

> Can we explore this issue from a not-panicked perspective? I think we tried doing that. See, for example, Carl Sagan testifying before Congress in 1985 [1]. I _wish_ that fossil fuels could be on your list. I think a main reason why nothing is being done is that oil is big business! Oil companies have toppled a democratically elected government because that government was cutting into their oil profits [2]. Moving away from fossil fuels would cut into oil's bottom line, so they paid lots of money to discredit and oppose climate change research for decades [3]. [1]: this video [2]: link [3]: link

We were warned about the coal problem in China/India 40 years ago. this video We were also warned that even if the United States solved the problem that it wasn’t enough. People think they can convince several billion people to give up meat but replacing several thousand coal power plants is too hard… “Local governments in China approved more new coal power in the first three months of 2023 than in the whole of 2021, according to official documents” link

“Gotta start somewhere” We’re about 40 years into “getting started”. One of the main problems was identified in 1985. this video

That's Al Gore at 11:28. this video If you watch the entire video, you'll see he's actively involved on this committee presentation, arguments and deliberation. link

How have we done in the last 40 years dealing with climate change? Peak fossil fuels Real Soon Now I’d say Carl Sagan nailed it: this video

40 years ago Carl Sagan said to stop burning coal and make sure India and China don’t use all their reserves. Imagine how much more time we would have if we’d have listened. this video We should be very close to peak coal sometime this decade.

We’ve had 40 years and we’re still burning all the coal Carl Sagan warned us about. this video So, after 40 years I’m a little tired of hearing it takes too long to build nuclear power plants. On the bright side, we’ve almost reached peak coal: link

>If doomers were good at predicting these events and how it will play out they'd all be rich as hell, but no, they are for the most part a bunch of broke whiners. Oh, the classic "if you're so smart then why aren't you rich" non argument. I'm sure Carl Sagan was a just whiny loser because he didn't figure out how to become a billionaire from knowing how physics works. His prediction that the planet would warm several degrees by the mid to late 21st century failed to reward him what he was owed. By the way we haven't even gotten halfway there yet, so your "shifting goalposts" thesis is null. People who push dangerous neoliberal propaganda like carbon capture or "infinite growth on a finite planet is possible" on the other hand do get very rich, and they don't even need to make good predictions. Such is the planet governed by pedophiles. this video