Talks to Watch

What keeps a train on the track?

191K views · Sep 22, 2009 · 2:27 · 1 HN recommender · 3 mentions · discussed 2019–2022

A short clip of Richard Feynman explaining how a train stays on its tracks, through the conical shape of wheels and how it handles curves without differentials.

Why Hacker News points people here: HN links it as a great, surprising explanation whenever rail wheels, gauge or curves come up.

“Here's a great explanation by Richard Feynman”HN comment, 2020

What Hacker News said 3

Recommendsfrosted-flakesJun 2020

“Here's a great explanation by Richard Feynman”

Explains how conical wheels self-steer on curves.

Full comment

> unlike the cylindrical profile which again just steers with the flange basically rubbing against the edge of the railhead. That's crazy. That means that the wheels are actually slipping when going around a corner, because the wheels are all the same diameter. Unlike conical wheels, which are essentially self-steering. Here's a great explanation by Richard Feynman: this video How could the BART trains possibly have cylindrical wheels? Conical wheels have been used on trains for ages, so that's seems weird. But doing some research, it seems that, yes, they were cylindrical: > Queensland Railways, for its first hundred years, used cylindrical wheels and vertical rails. With non-inclined rails and cylindrical wheels, the wheel squeal from trains taking curves on that railway was slight. After adopting coned wheels and inclined rails from the mid 1980s, the wheel squeal from trains curving at the same location and at the same speed decreased immensely. Some modern systems, such as Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) in San Francisco, use cylindrical wheels and flat-topped rails; BART is now switching to conical tread to reduce the noise caused by flange/rail contact and loss of adhesion of one of the wheels on curves. -- link

in “New slats make the Golden Gate Bridge sound like a David Lynch movie” · view on HN
Cites itJackFrJun 2019

Feynman on why train axles need no differentials.

Full comment

Snopes rates it as partly true, and the author is a pedantic killjoy. It is broadly true that for 2000 years European vehicles matched their roads and adapting existing vehicles to new technology led to using axles that were the same size. Do other gauges exist? Of course. Are the true elements of this worth repeating? Sure. As an unrelated aside here’s Richard Feynman explaining why train axles don’t need differentials. this video

in “The Space Shuttle and the Horse's Rear End (2000)” · view on HN
Cites ittexaslonghorn5Jul 2022
Full comment

this video (video of Feynman explaining how trains stay on the track) Is this it? I found it in my YouTube history. Or this one, which superimposes free body diagram (of forces) on the wheels to show how it is self stabilizing? link

in “Why BART uses a nonstandard broad gauge” · view on HN