“This interview with Jim Simons is fantastic”
Fantastic interview with Jim Simons.
Full comment
RenTech is unparalleled and Medallion has proven itself for decades. This interview with Jim Simons is fantastic: this video

1.4M views · May 13, 2015 · 1:00:43 · 11 HN recommenders · 20 mentions · discussed 2015–2024
The full-length Numberphile interview with mathematician and hedge fund founder Jim Simons. He discusses his path from mathematics and codebreaking to founding Renaissance Technologies, his use of algorithms in markets, and his philanthropy.
Why Hacker News points people here: HN recommends it as the best readily available interview with Simons, notable for his emphasis on luck and a humble approach to success.
“the full length one is very good. it gives an understanding as to why simons has been so successful.”HN comment, 2019
“This interview with Jim Simons is fantastic”
Fantastic interview with Jim Simons.
RenTech is unparalleled and Medallion has proven itself for decades. This interview with Jim Simons is fantastic: this video
“the full length one is very good. it gives an understanding as to why simons has been so successful.”
Full-length interview explains why Simons has been so successful.
the full length one is very good. it gives an understanding as to why simons has been so successful. this video
“in the Numberphile interview, which is excellent, he really emphasized the notion of luck in success.”
Excellent interview emphasizing luck in success and a humble approach.
While I'm not one to fawn after billionaires, I found his life story and personality really fascinating. He really seemed to maintain a humble approach, and in the Numberphile interview, which is excellent, he really emphasized the notion of luck in success. He donated a ton of money in very targeted ways that have been extremely successful. I think because of his humble approach, lack of self-promotion, etc., he's a bit unknown outside certain circles, but his impact in certain areas has been big. While I wish that our country didn't have to rely on billionaires spearheading initiatives, which often goes the wrong way, Simons was absolutely an example of one of the good ones. this video
“there is a longer interview that goes into most of the same topics as well as several others here”
Longer interview covering most of the same topics and more.
If you found this interview interesting, there is a longer interview that goes into most of the same topics as well as several others here this video
“Here is an interview with James Simmons, the founder of Renaissance, fascinating guy.”
Interview with Renaissance's founder.
The title makes it out like he is a reclusive lone wolf programmer. He is the CEO of renaissance technologies, a hedge fund with 275 employees. I really feel misled and like they trying to portray him as a mysterious, dangerous loner. As a computer programmer, I take offense. Here is an interview with James Simmons, the founder of Renaissance, fascinating guy. this video
“Excellent interview with Numberphile here”
Excellent interview with Simons.
Ah, now I understand. For others: Simons Foundations --> James Simons, who is a hedge fund mananger worth ~ $14billion. Excellent interview with Numberphile here: this video
“For anyone interested in a great story about a world class mathematician who built a company that has used algorithms to beat the market”
Story of a mathematician beating the market with algorithms.
For anyone interested in a great story about a world class mathematician who built a company that has used algorithms to beat the market for the last few decades, James Simons has an impressive record: link this video link One other thing, the Simons Foundation funds Quanta Magazine, whose articles frequently appear on HN: link
“This Numberphile interview with him is interesting”
Interesting Numberphile interview with Simons.
Article is about this book that will be released on Tuesday. link This Numberphile interview with him is interesting: this video
“It's worth taking a look at the Numberphile interview with Simons”
Simons says they mostly use ML and simple techniques, plus market impact math.
> The Medallion fund has been closed to external capital since 1993, and analysis of the flagship fund’s annual returns suggests that significant distributions are made each year to keep the fund about the same size. For example, despite the fact that Medallion reported annual net returns above 29 percent every year between 2010 and 2018, the fund’s assets under management stayed at about $10 billion throughout that period. This suggests to me that whatever opportunities they're exploiting, they would vanish quickly if they would increase the fund's size (e.g. by compounding returns). It's worth taking a look at the Numberphile interview with Simons ( this video ). There he suggests that they're mostly using ML and other relatively simple techniques, with a bit of more advanced math when it comes to predicting how a trade will move the market. This chimes in well with the idea that they have to keep their trades relatively small in order to remain this profitable.
“A good Simons interview (by Numberphile) is”
A good interview with Simons.
Collected takeaways from “The Man Who Solved the Market” - a (good) book about Jim Simons and RenTec that ring plausible to me at link . A good Simons interview (by Numberphile) is this video .
“Numberphile have done a pretty good interview with him which is worth a watch.”
Pretty good full-length one-hour interview with Simons.
Numberphile have done a pretty good interview with him which is worth a watch. There is both a full length 1 hour interview [0] and a cut down interview running 18 minutes [1]. [0]: this video [1]: link
“Worth a watch if you haven't seen it and are into RenTec.”
Really good interview with his story.
More of a Musk fan myself. Since you mentioned him, Jim Simons has a really good interview too and it was pretty cool to hear his story [1]. Worth a watch if you haven't seen it and are into RenTec. [1] this video
“Full-length Numberphile interview”
Full-length Numberphile interview with Simons.
It's because James Simons is a serious and actually intelligent person with depth of knowledge, and thus, he is one that doesn't need to opine on random things. He also makes a lot of money in a very secretive way. I'm not sure why anyone expects him to expound in detail on how Renaissance Technologies does it. Simons also spends more money than some governments on very serious and advanced scientific research. I suppose he's rather busy with all his investments and philanthropy. Musk is busy selling himself and filling his unfillable ego. You can see in Simons' TED interview with Chris Anderson how he gets rather annoyed with Chris at times, particularly when Chris mentions Simons' "amazing mind" at around 8:30. Simons seems, to me, to be a rather pragmatic and humble person who doesn't particularly enjoy flattery. Chris even throws out a quote by Musk at the very end of the interview, fishing for some similar platitude from Simons, but Simons deftly avoids giving out such an empty quote. link Most interestingly, you can tell Simons' like of science and mathematics and alludes to his interest when he mentions his investment into the origins of life towards the end. There are two interesting talks or interviews I know of with Simons: * Full-length Numberphile interview: this video * His lecture on his life given at MIT: link Simons actually attributes a lot of his success to luck.
“this was a really good interview with one of the founders”
Really good interview with a Renaissance founder.
You can troll through the job postings of most of these companies and learn about their org structures and tech stacks. When I looked almost nothing is public other than older documentaries. Nanex had some neat wiring diagrams and a few videos clips if you google them. Don't get too excited you're not going to learn about some super secret strategy or anything. This book was good link in that is sort of explains at a high level how you'd build a company to look at something like this (think it was one of the last chapters). You'll need extremely deep/skilled hardware/networking groups, data acquisitions (think packet capture to data) folks, people to clean and maintenance massive the data repos, internal tool teams, quantitative analysts, traders, management/admin, etc. At this level just getting the fiber to each exchange likely costs many many millions. When you go and look through those job postings you can sort of slot these into your mental model of this flow and start to see how it might be put together. That book is good but if you are new to the topic it will be almost unreadable. At least it was for me. I had to read it 3-4 times over the years and still find new things as my knowledge grows. I don't know if rentec is a HFT firm or what strategies they use but this was a really good interview with one of the founders this video .
“You've got Gordon Gecko and then you have James Simons.”
Example of a mathematician succeeding with algorithms in finance.
It's great when you can use math, and remove humans from the process once the algorithms are written, to do something people thought was impossible. Was never trying to imply that's the pinnacle. You've got Gordon Gecko and then you have James Simons. this video Maybe the U.S. wouldn't rank so low in math and science if kids saw a few more career possibilities. link
“We have all watched James Simons, right?”
Yes, I know that. We have all watched James Simons, right? this video What does that have to do with being a more appropriate news headline? I was responding to the 'clickbait' comment.
“he explicitly talked about using math models to detect anomalies, e.g. trends.”
Simons discusses math models for detecting market anomalies and trends.
What's your view on cases like Renaissance Technologies? There's an interview online on James Simons ( this video ) - and he explicitly talked about using math models to detect anomalies, e.g. trends. It's also known that they've used Hidden Markov Models, at least in the early days.
“Simons was on Numberphile a while back.”
Simons's earlier Numberphile appearance.
I don't subscribe to wsj, so I can't read the article, but Simons was on Numberphile a while back. this video
“Funded by billionaire mathematician and hedge fund founder, where the algorithms make all the decisions”
Background on the hedge fund founder funding the research.
Funded by billionaire mathematician and hedge fund founder, where the algorithms make all the decisions this video 1976 winner of the Oswald Veblen Prize in Geometry link
“invited them to his New York Apartment for an interview.”
Interview that began Simons Foundation sponsorship of Numberphile.
They have many sponsors. Jim Discovered their channel, liked it and invited them to his New York Apartment for an interview. [1] From that time forward, all Numberphile videos have "Simons Foundation" at the end listed as a sponsor. [1]: Here is the video this video