Talks to Watch

Randomness is Random - Numberphile

893K views · Dec 18, 2018 · 13:31 · 4 HN recommenders · 4 mentions · discussed 2019–2022

Numberphile with Simon Pampena on how humans misunderstand randomness, including coin-flip sequences, run lengths and the gambler's fallacy.

Why Hacker News points people here: Recommended as an accessible demonstration that people are bad at producing or judging random sequences.

“Here's a great video demonstrating how people tend to misunderstand randomness”HN comment, 2019

What Hacker News said 4

RecommendsreidacdcJan 2019

“about playing the odds on predicting elements of a nominally-random coin-flip sequence using the expected run length.”

Accessible video on predicting coin-flip sequences

Full comment

There is a very accessible "numberphile" video which I think is closely related to this, about playing the odds on predicting elements of a nominally-random coin-flip sequence using the expected run length. this video

in “Perceptions of Randomness: Why Three Heads Are Better Than Four (2009) [pdf]” · view on HN
Recommendscodesushi42Jun 2019

“Here's a great video demonstrating how people tend to misunderstand randomness”

Shows how people misunderstand randomness

Full comment

I would argue that the problem with frequentist statistics is that it aligns with humans' flawed intuition of how randomness works. People are inherently obsessed with finding patterns to support their hypotheses. The problem is that what we perceive as random and extremely unlikely events are in fact much more probable than what we estimate from using Gaussian methods. And the frequentist approach helps to create this distortion by ignoring black swans. Here's a great video demonstrating how people tend to misunderstand randomness: this video

in “Interview on ”Bayesian Statistics the Fun Way”” · view on HN
RecommendswruzaSep 2019

“There is also a good Numberphile video on what we think random really is (it is not)”

What humans think random really is

Full comment

Oh, I remember good old fallout 1-2 when you have 42% hit chance but still miss 7 times in a row. There is also a good Numberphile video on what we think random really is (it is not) this video

in “A New Algorithm for Controlled Randomness” · view on HN
RecommendsthrowamonFeb 2022

“We don't pick numbers at random. At all. We're so bad at it that you can make money off this fact.”

People are bad at picking random numbers

Full comment

This may indirectly answer your question: this video TLDW: We don't pick numbers at random. At all. We're so bad at it that you can make money off this fact.

in “Some neurons are active when adding, others when subtracting” · view on HN