13K views · Dec 27, 2019 · 1:00:46 · 2 HN recommenders · 4 mentions · discussed 2020–2023
A 36C3 talk by Bunnie Huang arguing that open source is necessary but not sufficient for trustworthy hardware, because verifying hardware is destructive and so creates a time-of-check/time-of-use gap. It surveys supply chain security and classes of hardware attacks, and presents the Betrusted approach to narrowing that gap.
Why Hacker News points people here: HN commenters point to it whenever the question is how far hardware can be trusted, including FPGAs, supply chain attacks and firmware TPMs.
“Here's an excellent talk that addresses your question”HN comment, 2020
“Here's an excellent talk that addresses your question”
Excellent talk on trust problems in hardware
Here's an excellent talk that addresses your question: Open Source is Insufficient to Solve Trust Problems in Hardware [1]. [1] this video
“Here's an excellent talk that addresses your question”
Excellent talk on trust problems in hardware
Here's an excellent talk that addresses your question: Open Source is Insufficient to Solve Trust Problems in Hardware [1]. [1] this video
“did an excellent talk on the subject”
Bunnie's talk on FPGAs and physical supply chain attacks
As I'm sure you're aware FPGAs are nice because they can complicate things for an attacker in the physical supply chain. Andrew "bunnie" Huang did an excellent talk on the subject: this video
Cited on the limits of trusting hardware
There’s really no way to ever be 100% sure of hardware. Sure we could use FPGAs for all hardware and then the hardware “source” is software, but who makes the FPGAs? There’s techniques even under X-ray to mask a rogue chip. this video
