Talks to Watch

Eric Weinstein: Revolutionary Ideas in Science, Math, and Society | Lex Fridman Podcast #16

861K views · Mar 20, 2019 · 1:21:56 · 2 HN recommenders · 3 mentions · discussed 2019

Lex Fridman interviews mathematician and economist Eric Weinstein about science, mathematics, and society. The conversation ranges across physics, academia, AI and job displacement.

Why Hacker News points people here: HN refers to it for Weinstein's views on advanced math and physics and academia's problems, though some find him a bit kooky.

“Eric Weinstein (a bit kooky) explains his view on the trenches of advanced mathematics/physics”HN comment, 2019

What Hacker News said 3

RecommendscronixApr 2019

“Here's a good one from Eric Weinstein. The whole interview is good (about AI)”

Interview about AI, ending on job displacement

Full comment

You'd probably be interested in watching Ray Dalios recent interview: link Here's a good one from Eric Weinstein. The whole interview is good (about AI), but at the end he discusses this kind of issue (time is bookmarked): this video This is part of a good lecture by Dr. Jordan Peterson on IQ, AI, and how AI is and will continue to displace people who will have no means to work to support themselves: link

in “Nearly half of young millennials get thousands in support from parents” · view on HN
RecommendsabledonSep 2019

“Eric Weinstein (a bit kooky) explains his view on the trenches of advanced mathematics/physics”

Weinstein on advanced math/physics and academia's problems

Full comment

In this Lex Freidman interview, Eric Weinstein (a bit kooky) explains his view on the trenches of advanced mathematics/physics: this video He goes into depths about the problems right now in academia

in “Even Physicists Don’t Understand Quantum Mechanics” · view on HN
Cites itadaptiveValleysMar 2019

“At 33:45 of the podcast after he gives the kinetic-potential energy analogy to describe his distrust of Pinker's optimism.”

Weinstein discusses distrust of Pinker's optimism

Full comment

He doesn't consider himself a physicist either.[1] [1] this video At 33:45 of the podcast after he gives the kinetic-potential energy analogy to describe his distrust of Pinker's optimism.

in “Revolutionary Ideas in Science, Math, and Society [video]” · view on HN