The Eames Office's 1977 film Powers of Ten starts at a picnic in Chicago and zooms out by a factor of ten every ten seconds to the edge of the universe. It then zooms inward to a proton in a carbon atom.
Why Hacker News points people here: HN commenters recommend it as the classic visualization for building intuition about scale, and it comes up whenever a thread concerns scale or size comparisons.
“a classic video that demonstrates the scale of the Universe from the micro to the macro perspectives”HN comment, 2025
“is an excellent resource that is still shown in introductory university physics lectures”
Excellent resource for building intuition on scaling
Full comment
To build intuition on scaling, the 1997 "Powers of Ten" video is an excellent resource that is still shown in introductory university physics lectures: this video
Strongly recommendsvee-kayNov 2025
“a classic video that demonstrates the scale of the Universe from the micro to the macro perspectives”
Classic showing micro to macro scales by factors of ten
Full comment
I think the video I have linked above is Google's tribute to this Power Of Ten video (linked below, thanks to user dtgriscom for sharing the link in another comment), a classic video that demonstrates the scale of the Universe from the micro to the macro perspectives in a scaling increase by a factor of ten for each scene. Power of 10: this video Another relevant video (thanks to user christev for sharing the link): A Brief History of Geologic Time: link Absolutely humbling to realise how infinitesimally small and irrelevant our existence is, in the grand scheme of theme. Nature and science are amazing.
RecommendsjacquesmOct 2015
“Is a nice recap of just how vast the universe really is”
Recap of how vast the universe is and how small we are
Full comment
The base of that goes back to a very simple realization: On a cosmic scale nothing that we do is of great importance. This planet likely is not as special as we would like to think it is and we are not as special as we like to think we are. We are to the universe as a single bacterium is to us. this video Is a nice recap of just how vast the universe really is and how utterly insignificant we are within it, in spite of all we're figured out and have achieved collectively. It certainly humbles me.
Recommendscam_lAug 2018
“i remember being captivated by this film in the (mid? late?) 90s”
Captivating film recalled fondly, now partly possible in realtime
Full comment
It is, i remember being captivated by this film in the (mid? late?) 90s.. (from the late 70s, pieced together by hand). Never imagined it would be (partly) possible in realtime.. some 10 years later. (eagerly hanging out for orbit view milky way, but probably not in my lifetime) this video
Recommends_MicroftOct 2020
“It is a very short video, just 9 minutes long.”
Short 9-minute visualization of scales in the universe
Full comment
If you don't mind watching a nearly 50 year old video then I can recommend "Powers of Ten" [0], attempting to visualize the different scales on which things are happening in the universe we know of. It is a very short video, just 9 minutes long. [0] this video
RecommendsandosteinmetzDec 2021
“For any who haven't seen it, I also recommend Charles & Ray Eaemes'”
Classic Eames film on scale
Full comment
For any who haven't seen it, I also recommend Charles & Ray Eaemes' "Powers of Ten" this video
RecommendsokhobbJan 2022
“is I hope a fun video for anyone who hasn't seen it”
Fun film that originated within Scientific American
Full comment
I really liked the Powers of Ten article / film / book originated within SA which certainly doesn't justify any current editorial choices, but is I hope a fun video for anyone who hasn't seen it: this video
RecommendsphotochemsynMar 2023
“is short and simple but gives one a better feeling for what infinity represents”
Short simple film giving a feel for scale versus infinity
Full comment
The 1977 film Powers of Ten is short and simple but gives one a better feeling for what infinity represents (40 orders of magnitude isn't much in contrast to infinity, but is very large): this video There's also an hour-long talk by Prof. Raymond Flood on Cantor's Infinities on YT that covers all the mathematical history.
RecommendsyogsotothNov 2025
“I think it would be nice for people to take a look at them”
Conveys how vast space is, less artistic than listed films
Full comment
I think there are a few movies that made me realize how much the space is vast, empty and adverse to life. I think it would be nice for people to take a look at them: - Aniara (2018) - High Life (2018) and maybe in a less artistic view: - Powers of Ten (1977) yt: this video
Cites itnatepMar 2012
Cited as a source on how empty the universe is
Full comment
(Edit: I'm responding to each question in its own paragraph) What do you mean, 'infinite in dimension'? The universe has only 4 dimensions, 3 spatial, 1 in time. Your question barely makes sense to me. Why do you need to invoke infinite speeds and times? If 2 particles stay in the same place, and do not interact with each other (gravitationally, electromagnetically, etc) then the distance between those 2 particles would increase over time, due to the expansion of the universe. Yes, there is an infinite amount of matter in the universe [1] Maybe. If you pick a random direction and travel really fast for a really long time, the chances of you running into any other matter is extremely remote. [2] [1] link [2] this video
Cites itPetitPrinceApr 2013
“A bit like Power of Ten [1] and Scale of the Universe [2]”
Compared to a similar time-scale animation
Full comment
Isn't that (loosing yourself in the grand scheme of things) the whole point of the animation ? A bit like Power of Ten [1] and Scale of the Universe [2] but with time instead of space. [1] this video [2] link
Cites itDouble_CastSep 2016
Footnote citing it for scale of galaxies and atoms
Full comment
> You’re free to think about computation as acting on bits… but for those bits to do us any good, they have to actually represent something (e.g., data structures). I suspect this is a case of confusing epistemology with ontology. Galaxies are ontologically composite in that they're the highest holonym in the supervenience hierarchy [0]. Atoms are ontologically fundamental in that they're the the lowest meronym in the supervenience heirarchy. Galaxies are epistemically abstract in that the notion of galaxy is far removed from everyday experience. Atoms are also epistemically abstract in that the notion of atoms are also far removed from everyday experience. What's epistemically fundamental are the immediate objects of our everyday experience, like chairs and food. (My impression of Zen is that it advises to focus more on things like chairs and food [1].) link In the xkcd, which is more "fundamental", Math or Economics? Well, it depends. Likewise, what's more "fundamental", bits or ADT's? Well, it depends. [0] powers of 10: this video [1] link
Cites itDonHopkinsOct 2018
“it's like the two extreme endpoints of”
Comparison of two extremes of scale
Full comment
Wow, it's like the two extreme endpoints of "Powers of Ten". this video Those two transistors had better be hella good to justify the price difference.
Cites itTomMckennyMar 2019
“Made in 1977 and we can already comfortably go two orders of magnitude larger.”
Notes how far scale visualization has progressed since 1977
Full comment
>Space this video Made in 1977 and we can already comfortably go two orders of magnitude larger. Not bad.
Cites itbaumgarnDec 2020
“Also noticeable is the Eames' movie Powers of Ten”
Related early infinite-zoom film based on a childrens book
Full comment
Thanks for posting this, haven't seen it before! Original author of the Zoomquilt here. Also noticeable is the Eames' movie Powers of Ten this video and a similar movie Cosmic Zoom, link . They are both from 1968 and both based on a childrens book about the relative size of things in the universe, to my knowledge the first implementations of an infinite zoom effect.
Cites itdcgeibMar 2021
“The rest reminds me of a video I watched in physics class.”
Reminds commenter of a physics class video
Full comment
Thanks, I finally understand the beauty of A4. The rest reminds me of a video I watched in physics class. this video
Cites itchiphDec 2024
“they also made films like the famous”
Mentions Eames also made famous films
Full comment
Yes, the Eames were much more than furniture designers (often for Herman Miller) - they also made films like the famous "Powers of Ten" this video
Cites itsocalgal2Jun 2025
“Not the same but related?”
Related scale visualization with similar affordances
Full comment
Not the same but related? Powers of 10 by Eames this video Interestingly, that Hawking visualization makes all the same affordances mentioned in the 1 pixel visualization. They show the earth and moon to scale, then the video shows an aerial view with all the planets much too large. Jupiter is 2x the size of the sun. Saturn and its rings 2x that.
Cites itxtiansimonAug 2025
“The Eames film does this explicitly”
Eames film explicitly explores magnitude
Full comment
I like this work exploring magnitude. The Eames film does this explicitly, “Powers of Ten” (1977) A happy find is an exhibition catalogue on the theme of the numinous pre- and post-photography: Clair, Jean. Cosmos from Goya to De Chirico, from Friedrich to Kiefer: art in pursuit of the infinite (2000) this videolink
Cites itkecDec 2025
“a film made in the 70's for IBM by Charles and Ray Eames”
Original film made for IBM that others riff on
Full comment
These are all riffs on "Powers of 10", a film made in the 70's for IBM by Charles and Ray Eames: this video