Shows organized political pressure on controversial Wikipedia articles.
Full comment
Sure there is a lot of spam but there is also a lot of political pressure to influence politically controversial articles. This rather old video was an eye opener for me. this video
Cites itMinor49erOct 2022
“a lot of these things are already publicly known”
Example of organized online influence efforts
Full comment
You sign an NDA when you take the job. Going public often opens up the possibility for lawsuits. Plus, a lot of these things are already publicly known, but most people don't think that it affects them: linkthis videolink
CriticalandersrsMay 2023
“Some political groups [1][2] have mobs of Wikipedia editors trying to influence what you read.”
Full comment
There is a lot of demand to control the narrative on political articles. Some political groups [1][2] have mobs of Wikipedia editors trying to influence what you read. I'd be surprised if they didn't have a few moderator roles otherwise a lot of their work would be reverted. [1] this video [2] link
CriticalmalandrewJan 2025
“the JIDF has been astroturfing Wikipedia for far longer”
Full comment
To be fair, the JIDF has been astroturfing Wikipedia for far longer: this video Who knows where the balance actually lies, but it's not just pro-Palestinians doing the propaganda here. Israel has engaged in far more propaganda than pretty much everyone (except maybe the United States) since the hasbara policy was first established following the public image fallout from the Sabra and Shatila massacre. link
CriticaltinfoilhatterMay 2026
“I like how Wikipedia is referred to as the world's encyclopedia, while stuff like this goes on”
Full comment
I like how Wikipedia is referred to as the world's encyclopedia, while stuff like this goes on: this video