257K views · Jul 26, 2017 · 34:51 · 3 HN recommenders · 6 mentions · discussed 2017–2023
AdoredTV's history of Intel's monopolistic behavior over three decades, covering its dealings with AMD and its anti-consumer practices.
Why Hacker News points people here: Recommended as an overview of Intel's anti-competitive past and why it kept dominating despite AMD's competitive products.
“This is a very good overview of bad anti-consumer practices Intel has done throughout the last 30 years”HN comment, 2017
“it seems to explain a lot about how Intel has been less focused on building better technology in the last 10-15 years”
Explains how Intel's focus shifted away from better technology.
I watched this video yesterday, and it seems to explain a lot about how Intel has been less focused on building better technology in the last 10-15 years: this video I'm not sure how balanced the viewpoint in the video is, but the author comes up with a lot of references.
“This is a very good overview of bad anti-consumer practices Intel has done throughout the last 30 years”
Overview of Intel's anti-consumer practices over 30 years.
This is a very good overview of bad anti-consumer practices Intel has done throughout the last 30 years: this video
“To understand why Intel kept selling CPUs like pancakes despite this, check this out”
Why Intel kept selling despite AMD's performance lead.
I'm not sure what you mean. From the time AMD released the K7 'Athlon' CPU, until the time Intel released Core2, AMD was king of performance. That's a long spawn of time. To understand why Intel kept selling CPUs like pancakes despite this, check this out: this video
“Intels very anti-competitive behavior”
Evidence of Intel's anti-competitive history.
I assume you mean Linus from YouTubes "Linus Tech Tips", and not Linus Torvalds. Surprised you wouldn't clarify that considering what website this is. Considering Intel's history, I wouldn't bet they direct their efforts based on a YouTube reviewer. Also, considering Intels very anti-competitive behavior (e.g [0], [1], [2]), I am wary of stating Intel entering the DDR industry will make it any less corrupt. [0]: link [1]: link [2]: this video
“Because Intel played dirty and illegal[0].”
Intel's illegal practices held AMD back.
>AMD failed to capture the market despite making tremendous gains and legitimizing itself. Because Intel played dirty and illegal[0]. [0]: this video
“I never liked Intel[0].”
Reason for disliking Intel.
I'd still just buy the AMD gpu. Mature drivers, and better tested alongside AMD cpus. Also, I never liked Intel[0]. 0. this video
