Talks to Watch

Avoiding Microservice Megadisasters - Jimmy Bogard

439K views · Apr 6, 2017 · 45:27 · 2 HN recommenders · 3 mentions · discussed 2018–2023

Jimmy Bogard presents a post-mortem of a real microservices migration that turned into a slow distributed monolith. He covers the modeling, development and production problems and how the team recovered.

Why Hacker News points people here: Recommended as an entertaining cautionary talk on microservice failures and Conway's law.

“Inverse Conway Maneuver: Design the organization you want, the architecture will follow, kicking and screaming.”HN comment, 2018

What Hacker News said 3

Recommendstony-allanNov 2018

“Inverse Conway Maneuver: Design the organization you want, the architecture will follow, kicking and screaming.”

Conway's law and inverse Conway maneuver at 39:00

Full comment

this video (39:00) Conway's law: Any organization that designs a system (defined broadly) will produce a design whose structure is a copy of the organization's communication structure. Jimmy's law: A broken, dysfunctional organization driven by meeting unhealthy goals and metrics will produce broken, dysfunctional systems. Inverse Conway Maneuver: Design the organization you want, the architecture will follow, kicking and screaming.

in “Avoiding Microservice Megadisasters” · view on HN
RecommendsketzuJun 2023

“I also liked "Avoiding Microservice Megadisasters" but mostly for the entertainment value”

Entertaining talk on microservice failures

Full comment

It is such a weird feeling to come across a topic I haven't read on in a while, watch two videos on it out of random curiosity, hop on hackernews the next day, and get a recommendation for the exact same videos. I very much enjoyed the 5 techniques and many of the tidbits. I also liked "Avoiding Microservice Megadisasters" but mostly for the entertainment value ( this video )

in “Make microservices look like monoliths” · view on HN
Cites itetripeJan 2020

“scenarios like the Bell micro-services disaster (2)”

Example of a microservices disaster at Bell

Full comment

As your average developer who's heard architects mention these micro-frontends, I would have liked the article to start off by listing the use cases and trade-offs instead of jumping right on the hype train at full speed. Since the article mentions Piral, I thought I would peruse that project's documentation (0), but am none the wiser on basic questions like: how do components get assembled into the main application, is network traffic overhead is going to be a problem, etc. Delving further into the Piral docs, I came across a link to a sample micro-frontend (1) that seems to be importing every micro-frontend into the index, so network traffic overhead seems like it could be an issue. Does anyone here have experience with these in a production environment and know how to avoid (in my mind) basic pitfalls like these? As it stands, this article seems to be setting people up for scenarios like the Bell micro-services disaster (2) [0] link [1] link [2] this video

in “Reasons for Doing Microfront Ends” · view on HN