Talks to Watch

Andrej Karpathy: Tesla AI, Self-Driving, Optimus, Aliens, and AGI | Lex Fridman Podcast #333

4M views · Oct 29, 2022 · 3:28:48 · 3 HN recommenders · 11 mentions · discussed 2022–2025

Lex Fridman's long conversation with Andrej Karpathy on Tesla's self-driving approach, Optimus, neural networks, transformers, AGI and more. It also touches on his OpenAI work and working with Elon Musk.

Why Hacker News points people here: Cited for Karpathy's first-hand explanations of camera-only self-driving, transformers and ML trends.

“Anyone seriously interested in this question should listen to the Lex Friedman interview of Andrej Karpathy”HN comment, 2023

What Hacker News said 11

Strongly recommendstdalaaJan 2023

“Anyone seriously interested in this question should listen to the Lex Friedman interview of Andrej Karpathy”

Essential listening on self-driving

Full comment

Anyone seriously interested in this question should listen to the Lex Friedman interview of Andrej Karpathy: this video

in “Will Tesla Ever “Solve” Full Self Driving? (2022)” · view on HN
RecommendsjcimsNov 2022

“Great listen overall IMHO”

Karpathy expands on comparing neural nets to brain, finding physics 0-days

Full comment

Andrej Karpathy was recently on Lex Fridman's podcast and covered this to some extent. He has the same perspective on this topic and expanded on it quite a bit. Great listen overall IMHO - this video I like his idea of finding 0-days in physics. :)

in “Study urges caution when comparing neural networks to the brain” · view on HN
RecommendsmekenDec 2022

“this was the takeaway I got from this explanation (starts at 36:21)”

Explanation of transformer layers as message passing

Full comment

My understanding is the transformer layer in the LLM is basically doing something akin to message passing, it’s like a mini computer. In predicting the next word, it has to understand a lot about a lot of different kinds of topics My understanding is kinda fuzzy because I haven’t coded it up myself, but this was the takeaway I got from this explanation (starts at 36:21) this video

Cites itjstx1Oct 2022

“There's absolutely scope to build a better search engine based on these tools.”

Karpathy on scope for a better search engine

Full comment

At 1:03:30 - this video > I think there's definitely scope in building a better search engine today. Google have all the tools, all the people, (...) all the data, it's just not obvious that they're capable as an organization to innovate on their search engine right now, and if they don't, someone else will. There's absolutely scope to build a better search engine based on these tools.

in “Andrej Karpathy: Tesla AI, Self-Driving, Optimus, Aliens, and AGI” · view on HN
Cites itnvernoNov 2022

“Andrej Karpathy talked a bit about working with Elon recently”

Engineer's account of working with Elon

Full comment

If you want to get an idea, why not listen to some engineers that have worked with him? There are plenty of those around, for example, Andrej Karpathy talked a bit about working with Elon recently - this video

in “Twitter to employees: all office buildings closed, badge access suspended” · view on HN
Cites itnuccyNov 2022

“it seems machine learning takes the same path as physics already did.”

Karpathy discusses ML following physics' path to big collaborations

Full comment

As pointed out in [1], it seems machine learning takes the same path as physics already did. In the mid-20th century there was a "break" in physics, before individuals were making ground breaking discoveries in their private/personal labs (think Newton, Maxwell, Curie, Roentgen, Planck, Einstein, and many others) later huge collaborations (LHC/CERN, Icecube, EHT, et al.) are required, since the machinery, simulations, models are so complex, that groups of people are needed to create, comprehend and use them. 1. this video Lex Fridman podcast with Andrej Karpathy P.S. To counteract that (unintentionally actually, likely because of a simple optimization of instruments' duty cycle) in astronomy people come up with a concept of "observatory" (Like Hubble, JWST) instead of "experiment" (like LHC, HESS telescopes) where outside people can submit their proposals, and if selected get observational time. Along with raw data authors of the proposals get required expertise from the collaboration to process and analyze that data.

Cites itTepixMar 2023

“Karpathy talks about the OpenAI project”

Karpathy discusses OpenAI's World of Bits project

Full comment

Yeah, check out the Lex Friedman podcast episode #333 around minute 52 where Andrew Karpathy talks about the OpenAI project "World of Bits" that did this. this video

in “Microsoft Kosmos-1: A Multimodal Large Language Model” · view on HN
Cites it1970-01-01Mar 2023

“Humor was one of the tests Karpathy would use as a benchmark for AI”

Karpathy on humor as an AI benchmark

Full comment

>your boyfriend’s only in a wheelchair because he doesn’t want to kneel five times a day Within the roast context, this is a good line. Humor was one of the tests Karpathy would use as a benchmark for AI: this video

Cites ityregAug 2023

“Karpathy explains the reasoning on Lex's podcast”

Karpathy explains the camera-only reasoning

Full comment

Karpathy explains the reasoning on Lex's podcast[1]. This was after he left Tesla, but of course he's hardly impartial. [1] this video

in “Camera Crushes Lidar, Claims Startup” · view on HN
Cites itnomelFeb 2025

“There's some talk about it in the Lex Friedman podcast(s)”

Discussion of Tesla AI data collection goals

Full comment

This, obviously, is one of the ongoing efforts and goals of Tesla AI, and the reason they collect so much data. There's some talk about it in the Lex Friedman podcast(s)[1]. [1] this video

in “Tesla Cybertruck Drives Itself into a Pole, Owner Says 'Thank You Tesla'” · view on HN
Cites itkamranjonJul 2025

“Here is a link to Karpathy discussing the trade-offs”

Karpathy discussing camera versus lidar trade-offs

Full comment

The part that I always found difficult to square was not that Elon Musk towed this “no need for LiDAR” line so hard, but that Andrej Karpathy, who I generally consider a very reliable voice in this space, was also in strong agreement that cameras were all that was needed. Does anyone know if he still believes cameras is all you need? Edit: Here is a link to Karpathy discussing the trade-offs: this video

in “How Tesla is proving doubters right on why its robotaxi service cannot scale” · view on HN