Talks to Watch

How did Microsoft screw this up? - Surface Pro X (SQ2) vs M1 Macbook Air

2.8M views · Jan 5, 2021 · 10:56 · 0 HN recommenders · 11 mentions · discussed 2021–2022

Linus Tech Tips compares Microsoft's Surface Pro X (SQ2) with the Apple M1 MacBook Air, focusing on how Windows on Arm and x86 emulation perform against Apple's Arm hardware. The verdict is that the Surface falls well short.

Why Hacker News points people here: Cited as evidence of how poorly Windows x86 emulation on Arm performed in 2021 compared with Apple's M1 and Rosetta.

“Windows runs at less than half the speed on Microsoft's own flagship ARM hardware.”HN comment, 2021

What Hacker News said 11

Cites itHamukoJan 2021

“It was not pretty.”

Surface Pro X versus M1 MacBook Air comparison.

Full comment

Linus Tech Tips actually just released a video a couple of hours ago where they compared the Surface Pro X SQ2 with the M1 MacBook Air. It was not pretty. this video

in “Asahi Linux: Linux on Apple Silicon project” · view on HN
Cites itGeekyBearJan 2021

Windows x86-64 emulation on ARM has compatibility issues.

Full comment

Legacy x86-64 app emulation has only just appeared in alpha form and still has massive compatibility issues. I'd still call it something we hope to see in the future, instead of a working proof of concept. this video

in “Asahi Linux: Linux on Apple Silicon project” · view on HN
Cites itporccJan 2021

“windows in a VM outperforms windows PCs at the price point”

Windows in a VM on M1 outperforms comparable Windows PCs.

Full comment

this video windows in a VM outperforms windows PCs at the price point--plus like other commenters mention it comes with a native Unix shell

in “The M1 MacBook Air is the best computer I've ever owned” · view on HN
Cites itGeekyBearJan 2021

“Windows runs at less than half the speed on Microsoft's own flagship ARM hardware.”

Windows runs slower on Surface Pro X than on M1.

Full comment

The comparison to Microsoft's more expensive 2020 Surface Pro X is especially stark. Windows runs at less than half the speed on Microsoft's own flagship ARM hardware. this video

in “The M1 MacBook Air is the best computer I've ever owned” · view on HN
Cites itpmarreckMar 2021

“it looks like Windows is not yet ready”

Windows not yet ready for ARM versus Apple.

Full comment

The raving in this thread is to me indicative of how far behind Intel has fallen behind ARM in technical terms. Now we just need more, better, faster ARM-based chips. Linux is ready, macOS is ready... but it looks like Windows is not yet ready: this video

in “M1 MacBook Air hits 900 GFlops in the browser with Safari's experimental WebGPU” · view on HN
Cites itGeekyBearMay 2021

“to see how far behind Qualcomm is”

Shows how far behind Qualcomm is.

Full comment

Samsung's custom cores haven't been competitive with Qualcomm so far, much less Apple. You only have to look at comparisons between the Surface Pro X and the M1 Macbook Air to see how far behind Qualcomm is. this video

in “Samsung to jump into laptop processor market with Exynos chip in H2” · view on HN
Cites itGeekyBearOct 2021

x64 emulation performed poorly on Surface hardware.

Full comment

They introduced x64 64 bit emulation in the Dev channel several months ago, but it didn't work well at all. It also was more performant running in a VM on last year's MacBook Air than running natively on Microsoft's flagship hardware. this video

in “Dropbox Sync does not natively support Apple Silicon” · view on HN
Cites itGeekyBearFeb 2022

Test of x86 software compatibility on ARM Windows.

Full comment

Has Windows gotten any better at running x86-64 Windows software on ARM hardware? The last time I saw this tested, it was more likely to fail than succeed, but it's been a while. this video

in “Lenovo announces the first Arm-based ThinkPad” · view on HN
Cites itGeekyBearJun 2022

“That boat already sailed over a year ago.”

Windows already runs better on Apple hardware than on PCs.

Full comment

> It would be a huge embarrassment to have Apple hardware running Windows that much better than all the native PCs. That boat already sailed over a year ago. >How did Microsoft screw this up? - Surface Pro X (SQ2) vs M1 Macbook Air this video

in “Welcome to the M1 Windows project” · view on HN
CriticalGeekyBearOct 2021

“how poorly Microsoft's x86 to ARM emulation works”

Full comment

>This part of the article was particularly cringe. People don't seem to realize how much of a tech prowess it is that x86 builds of those two games are even running at an acceptable framerate. Spoken like someone who has never seen how poorly Microsoft's x86 to ARM emulation works. this video They had difficulty getting programs to work at all, much less have acceptable performance under emulation.

in “Apple's M1 Pro, M1 Max SoCs Investigated” · view on HN
CriticalGeekyBearApr 2022

“Surface Pro X didn't support 64 bit x86 Windows applications at all”

Full comment

> IMO Microsoft has put much more effort into a thoughtful x86 -> ARM transition than Apple did. Given that the Surface Pro X didn't support 64 bit x86 Windows applications at all, I'm not sure how you can think so. Even after developer channel support was added, it was unlikely to work. >How did Microsoft screw this up? - Surface Pro X (SQ2) vs M1 Macbook Air this video

in “Qualcomm’s M1-class laptop chips will be ready for PCs in “late 2023”” · view on HN