Destin Sandlin of Smarter Every Day explains 'Facebook freebooting', where Facebook users re-upload YouTubers' videos natively and the original creators lose views and revenue. He describes his own attempts to get Facebook to act.
Why Hacker News points people here: HN cites it as the first-hand account of video piracy on Facebook whenever the platform's treatment of creators comes up.
“Did you watch his video where he explains his views himself? I find it pretty convincing”
Creator explains his views on Facebook freebooting convincingly.
Full comment
Did you watch his video where he explains his views himself? I find it pretty convincing: this video Interestingly, a lot of people are getting very frustrated with Facebook for other reasons as well. Famously, there's Veritasium's video: link I can really appreciate what they're feeling. With piracy as we have traditionally known it, at least usually the pirate is not directly profiting from his act of piracy. With freebooting, Facebook is literally profiting from other people's work. It's directly diverting money flow from the creator (who REALLY NEED THE MONEY) to Facebook. I think it's plainly ridiculous this is happening, and obviously Facebook will turn a blind eye to it because it's making them money. This is one of the reasons why I encourage whitehat security researchers to turn a little gray when it comes to Facebook and do things to bring them down, it'll be for the greater good to bring the behemoth down.
Cites itlipsJul 2015
“Destin mentions in his "intro to freebooting" video his various attempts to contact Facebook regarding the piracy”
Creator describes trying to get Facebook to remove his pirated video.
Full comment
They're both at fault, to varying degrees, explicitly or implicitly. Destin mentions in his "intro to freebooting" video his various attempts to contact Facebook regarding the piracy, and that it was only removed after a Twitter campaign led by his viewers: this video I don't know much, or have any experience with DMCA, but it's my impression that if there's a copyright violation on Youtube, the video can be taken down very quickly, and the burden of proof is then placed on the uploader to get it back up.
Cites itpen2lOct 2015
“See for a first-hand account of the situation.”
First-hand account of creators losing revenue to Facebook re-uploads.
Full comment
It's parasitic because of its particular approach. For example, it could embed youtube videos... so that the real creators get their pay, but no, Facebook would rather that the videos be Facebook videos, thereby the original creator getting zero profit from his hard work. See this video for a first-hand account of the situation.
Cites itforrestthewoodsDec 2015Full comment
I didn't say Udemy was responsible for flagging content. But I am saying there's no fucking way there are only 125 copyright infringing cases. It's a shit ton more. It may not be their responsibility to find them. But to imply that's the extent of the problem is wrong and a lie. "nor can anyone other than the copyright holder reasonably be expected to" I don't think this is a fundamentally true statement. For example I believe that Facebook has a moral obligation to provide tools to stop freebooting. this video
Cites itpen2lDec 2015
“Facebook steals money from content creators who really need the money”
Full comment
Consider as well that Facebook steals money from content creators who really need the money . See this video & link Also, the idea of having Facebook at the cost of giving up your privacy to this behemoth, and more importantly, at the cost of this company exploiting your cognitive biases to get you to buy things hardly seems conducive to a spirit of bettering the world.
Cites itsnthdDec 2015Full comment
>“Freebooting” is a silly but oddly appropriate word invented by YouTubers CGP Grey and Brady Haran that means “taking online media and re-hosting it on your website without permission.” linkthis video
Cites itpdkl95Jan 2016
“They also have a history of encouraging video fraud[2][3].”
Cited as evidence Facebook encouraged video fraud.
Full comment
Facebook has a history of fraud in their other services. Veritasium fell victim to FB's scams as a publisher a couple years ago[1]. I know first-hand that Facebook's advertising model is deeply flawed. When I paid to promote my page I gained 80,000 followers in developing countries who didn't care about Veritasium (but I wasn't aware of this at the time). They drove my reach and engagement numbers down, basically rendering the page useless. They also have a history of encouraging video fraud[2][3]. [1] link [2] this video [3] link
Cites itRalfpMay 2016
“told a story in one of his videos about slow-mo clip of tatoo machine in action being ripped”
Story of a slow-mo clip ripped, reuploaded, then DMCA-claimed against the original.
Full comment
SmarterEveryDay told a story in one of his videos about slow-mo clip of tatoo machine in action being ripped from one of his movies by the large press publisher, Bauer, and reuploaded on Bauer's Facebook page. Then Bauer moved on to claim DMCA on his original uploaded by him on his Facebook page: this video
Cites itTAForObvReasonsMay 2018
“It's absolutely insane that freebooting [1] on Facebook was allowed to persist for so long.”
Full comment
It's absolutely insane that freebooting [1] on Facebook was allowed to persist for so long. It's easy to see the right to monetary remuneration as a method of addressing a massive loophole exploited by Facebook and certain users for years. [1] this video
Cites itwolphJul 2019Full comment
It's apparently a bit of a hassle to get it removed at times though. And in most cases far to late for it to really matter: this video
