3Blue1Brown's third deep learning chapter gives a visual, intuitive account of backpropagation and what happens to a neural network as it learns. A follow-up video covers the underlying calculus.
Why Hacker News points people here: Recommended as the most accessible introduction to backprop for people who struggle with the pure math.
“I found the explainations by 3Brown1Blue to be very intuitive when it comes to neural networks”HN comment, 2018
“my fear of ML was gone away and I'm very excited to explore whole new world for neural networks”
Accessible math and neural network explanations that removed fear of ML
Full comment
I'm in the same boat. For long time, I was interested in AI but at the same time intimidated by math. I'm relatively comfortable with discrete mathematics and classical algorithms and at the same time calculus and linear algebra is completely foreign to me. Also, I do not accept way to learn ML without good understanding of core principles behind it. So math is a must. A few months ago, I stumbled upon very amazing YouTube Channel 3Blue1Brown which explains math in very accessible way and at the same time I got feeling that I finally started understanding core ideas behind linear algebra and calculus. Just recently he published 4 videos about deep neural networks: linklinkthis videolink So my fear of ML was gone away and I'm very excited to explore whole new world for neural networks and other things like support vector machines etc
Strongly recommendspastelskyJun 2018
“I found the explainations by 3Brown1Blue to be very intuitive when it comes to neural networks”
Intuitive backprop explanation for newcomers who struggle with pure math
Full comment
While we're at this, I found the explainations by 3Brown1Blue to be very intuitive when it comes to neural networks, especially for folks who're new and don't necessarily grasp concepts when explained primarily through math. What is backpropagation really doing? this video His other videos on this topic are just as good.
RecommendsnouveauxNov 2017
“This was very timely for me and for anyone else learning, here are the first few videos of the series”
Part of a video series for learners
Full comment
This was very timely for me and for anyone else learning, here are the first few videos of the series: linklinkthis video (Original video) link
RecommendssxpApr 2021
“I recommend 3Blue1Brown's neural net videos instead”
Better alternative to a wordy article
Full comment
This has a lot of words, but not enough content. I recommend 3Blue1Brown's neural net videos instead: this video
Cites itseanhunterOct 2024
Cited as a source explaining backpropagation
Full comment
It's not satire. If you have some function with several inputs, the Jacobian is a matrix of all the partial derivatives of this function with respect to each input variable[1]. Since derivatives give the slope of a function, if you think about your function as being like a bumpy surface with the height at each point being the output, this matrix tells you which way (and how far) to change any input if you want to go "up" or "down" in the output. Backpropogation is a way to optimise a neural network. You want to know how best to nudge the weights of the network to optimise some loss function, so what you do is compute the gradient (ie partial derivative) of that function with respect to each of the weights. This allows you to then tweak the weights of the function so your network gets better at whatever task you're trying to get it to learn. See [2] to understand how this works and and [3] to understand how this relates to the Jacobian, but generally if you're trying to go "downhill" in your loss function it's easy to see intuitively that knowing which way the function slopes (ie the effect of tweaking each of the weights) is important and that's what the Jacobian tells you. The inverse of a matrix[4] and its transpose[5] are two different operations in linear algebra. Transpose turns rows into columns and columns into rows and the inverse of a matrix is a little harder to grasp maybe without background, but you could think of multiplying one matrix by the inverse of another a