Talks to Watch

Yes, Prime Minister - Nuclear deterrent

797K views · Jan 5, 2008 · 5:52 · 0 HN recommenders · 5 mentions · discussed 2013–2026

A sketch from the British sitcom Yes, Prime Minister in which Jim Hacker and the chief scientific advisor discuss the logic of the nuclear deterrent.

Why Hacker News points people here: HN commenters cite it as a funny but precise take on deterrence strategy and politics.

“This sketch is a humorous but precise assessment of this strategic issue”HN comment, 2014

What Hacker News said 5

Cites itrolloJul 2014

“This sketch is a humorous but precise assessment of this strategic issue”

Sketch as humorous but precise assessment of nuclear strategy

Full comment

It's precisely the other way arround. This sketch is a humorous but precise assessment of this strategic issue: this video Relying on nuclear deterrent against modern hybrid warfare means you will lose.

in “Germany turns up pressure in suspected US spy case” · view on HN
Cites itRegWNov 2014

“A better explanation in "Yes, Prime Minister"”

Explains deterrence logic better, relevant to states tampering with satellites

Full comment

A better explanation in "Yes, Prime Minister": this video ... and perhaps relevant to the discussions of states tampering with other people's satellites.

in “SpaceX Will Announce Micro-Satellites for Low Cost Internet Within Three Months” · view on HN
Cites itupboundspiralMay 2026

“is eerily close to what they discussed in an episode of Yes Prime Minister in the 80s.”

Episode discusses tackling unemployment through defense spending

Full comment

Your solution (of tackling unemployment by tacking it onto national defense), is eerily close to what they discussed in an episode of Yes Prime Minister in the 80s. this video link

in “Iran mulls taking control of all 7 cables passing through Strait of Hormuz” · view on HN
Cites iteinpoklumAug 2026

“Reminds me a bit of that 'Yes Prime Minister' sketch about nuclear deterrant”

Sketch about last resort in nuclear deterrence

Full comment

It's very weird looking in from the outside. I mean, sure, the US is the dominant power and everything, so things like Iraq and Iran could be construed as just collateral damage from their imperial maneuvers. But it has just piled on, more and more, and even when they are hit right in the face with the massive bombing of NordStream, still practically nobody tries to draw any sort of line. Reminds me a bit of that 'Yes Prime Minister' sketch about nuclear deterrant, when the skeptical conversant asks the PM: "So what is the last resort, Picadilli?" this video

in “Anthropic's 'Watermark' Text Adulteration in Claude Is a Perversion of Writing” · view on HN
JokeicebrainingNov 2013

“Yes, Prime Minister has a funny scene about the nuclear deterrent”

Full comment

So what would you do if a country with nuclear capabilities started attacking the US with conventional forces? Yes, Prime Minister has a funny scene about the nuclear deterrent: this video

in “Can the Defense Budget Shrink Without Risking National Security?” · view on HN