Talks to Watch

How Much Do Rockets Pollute? Are They Bad For Our Air?

1.3M views · Mar 20, 2020 · 55:46 · 6 HN recommenders · 9 mentions · discussed 2020–2023

Everyday Astronaut's Tim Dodd runs an hour-long, data-driven analysis of what rockets actually emit and how that compares with airliners and other industries. It breaks down exhaust by propellant type, per-passenger and total emissions, and ways launches could be cleaner.

Why Hacker News points people here: HN commenters cite it whenever rocket launch pollution comes up as a rebuttal to alarm, since it shows launches are small next to other sources.

“I highly recommend to everyone who is concerned about this.”HN comment, 2021

What Hacker News said 9

Strongly recommendssystemvoltageJul 2021

“I highly recommend to everyone who is concerned about this.”

Data-driven look at rocket pollution.

Full comment

Everyday Astronaut did an hour long video on "How Much Do Rockets Pollute? Are They Bad For Our Air?": this video I highly recommend to everyone who is concerned about this. The knee-jerk reaction needs to be toned down a little bit, we need to look at the data first.

in “Richard Branson ready for today's 'extraordinary' space flight” · view on HN
RecommendsKuiNJun 2020

“has a great video on the environmental impact of rockets”

Rockets pollute less than expected but not zero.

Full comment

Everyday Astronaut on YouTube has a great video on the environmental impact of rockets. 55 minutes long but it's fascinating. The TL;DW is they're not as bad as you'd expect. But not zero-emissions, obviously. this video

in “SpaceX Starlink is now its own ASN and present at the Seattle Internet Exchange” · view on HN
RecommendsdanpalmerFeb 2021

“Great video here about this”

Rocket pollution is small compared to other industries.

Full comment

Great video here about this: this video The summary is that yes they pollute a lot for what they are, but compared to almost any other major polluting industry (travel, freight, construction, etc) it's barely anything and won't be much of a problem for a long time.

in “Elon Musk wants clean power. But Tesla's carrying Bitcoin's dirty baggage” · view on HN
RecommendschrispeelJul 2021

“I found Tim's video to be more informative than the Conversation article”

Per-passenger CO2 estimates for Starship versus a 737.

Full comment

At 37:00 of the video below, Tim Dodd concludes that SpaceX's Starship will emit 1.79 metric tons of CO2 per passenger, while a 737 will emit .33 tons. SpaceX wants to generate Starship's methane from the atmosphere, so it could be zero I found Tim's video to be more informative than the Conversation article this video

in “Space tourism: rockets emit 100 times more CO₂ per passenger than flights” · view on HN
RecommendsrwesterdahlAug 2021

“made a great youtube video about rocket launch pollution, check that out for sure”

Launch pollution stays small versus other industries.

Full comment

Great question and I suspect you are correct regarding the impact being small (Tim Dodd the everyday astronaut, made a great youtube video about rocket launch pollution, check that out for sure this video ). He concluded that even with increased launch rates, the pollution remains small compared to other industries such as the airline industry. Not the same thing, but I'd argue the impact from satellites and debris burning up is less than the rocket it took to get up there in the first place. All that being said, we at Turion Space don't want to build a sustainable future in space at the cost of polluting Earth. For the first missions, we will drag the debris down to burn up in Earth's atmosphere, but long term, we plan to utilize reusable launch vehicle upper stages (think Starship, Relativity, and others) to bring stuff back down for us. It's a bit of an essay for a simple question, but regardless of how polluting it may be, with fully reusable launch vehicles coming online in the same time frame we are looking at performing missions, we will use those to bring stuff back down.

in “Launch HN: Turion Space (YC S21) – Space debris removal and satellite servicing” · view on HN
RecommendsmanuelmorealeSep 2021

“this is a good video to watch”

Answers the question about rocket pollution.

Full comment

If you really are interested in the answer to your question about pollution this is a good video to watch this video

in “Amazon asked FCC to reject Starlink plan because it can’t compete, SpaceX says” · view on HN
RecommendsmanuelmorealeOct 2023

“Relevant video that goes quite deep into the topic”

Deep dive on rocket pollution concerns.

Full comment

Relevant video that goes quite deep into the topic if you’re actually concerned about rocket pollution: this video

in “Next year, SpaceX aims to average one launch every 2.5 days” · view on HN
Cites itsystemvoltageAug 2021

“he did an entire hour long video on this”

Hour-long analysis showing rocket pollution is negligible.

Full comment

I am sorry but this is false. Toxicity and polluting aspects of Rockets is of a negligible concern, Everyday Astronaut (Youtube fame) gets this so often that he did an entire hour long video on this: this video > Rockets on unplanned trajectories can ruin people's day Well darn.

in “SpaceX installed 29 Raptor engines on a Super Heavy rocket last night” · view on HN
Cites itnyokodoFeb 2022

“Checkout Everyday Astronaut”

Counters claim that launch carbon impact is obscene.

Full comment

> The carbon impact of just one launch is pretty obscene. It isn’t really. Checkout Everyday Astronaut’s take on it: this video

in “Starlink lost 40 satellites to a geomagnetic storm” · view on HN