Sabine Hossenfelder asks whether complex numbers are just a convenient tool or necessary in physics. She discusses a recent paper arguing that quantum mechanics cannot be done with real numbers alone.
Why Hacker News points people here: HN recommends it as a short, accessible layperson explanation of the real-versus-complex quantum theory debate.
“I highly recommend video by Sabine Hossenfelder [1] on this topic.”HN comment, 2022
“I highly recommend video by Sabine Hossenfelder [1] on this topic.”
Layman explanation of whether complex numbers physically exist
Full comment
I highly recommend video by Sabine Hossenfelder [1] on this topic. She's explaining the topic in layman terms, starting from what does it mean to exist (or be real) in physical sense. Complex numbers, as useful as they are, just an abstraction, a tool which can be replaced with different forms of calculations. That makes the question of "reality" rather complex (pardon the pun). [1] this video
Recommendsjohnp271Dec 2021
“There is a nice 10 minute discussion about this paper by physicist Sabine Hossenfelder”
Ten-minute discussion of the real-number quantum theory paper
Full comment
There is a nice 10 minute discussion about this paper by physicist Sabine Hossenfelder on her "Science without the gobbelydgook" youtube series (which I recommend). She considers the existential questions regarding necessity of complex numbers a "super-niche nerd fight". You can find the video here this video .
RecommendsarsApr 2023
“This video by Sabine Hossenfelder is probably more informative on this topic”
More informative discussion of the paper
Full comment
This video by Sabine Hossenfelder is probably more informative on this topic: this video (it discusses this paper).
